[Push] Wondering about Code

[Rud Merriam]

I had the thought that NAMES might be useful in the following:

1. Evolve a system to handle a subtask of a larger problem.
2. Store the subtask as a NAME'd function that was locked from further
evolution.
3. Evolve the next larger step in the larger problem allowing use of the
NAME'd function. 

 
 - 73 - 
Rud Merriam K5RUD 
http://mysticlakesoftware.com/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Spector [mailto:lspector at hampshire.edu] 
> 
> I would LOVE to be proven wrong about this, however, or to 
> see an alternative version of the NAME concept that makes 
> NAME-containing programs easier to evolve and more useful in general.
> 
> 
>  -Lee
> 
> --
> Lee Spector, Professor of Computer Science
> School of Cognitive Science, Hampshire College
> 893 West Street, Amherst, MA 01002-3359
> lspector at hampshire.edu, http://hampshire.edu/lspector/
> Phone: 413-559-5352, Fax: 413-559-5438
> 
> Check out Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines: 
> http://www.springer.com/10710 - http://gpemjournal.blogspot.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Push mailing list
> Push at lists.hampshire.edu 
> https://lists.hampshire.edu/mailman/listinfo/push
>