[Push] pushtalk

[Maarten]

On Monday 26 July 2004 18:17, Lee Spector wrote:
> Is it important that the name be short? If we're adding something
> beyond "push" and "language" I'd prefer it to be "evolutionary
> computation" or even "genetic and evolutionary computation"... or
> if it should be short maybe "ec" or "gec", but those will be
> meaningless to outsiders... "push-lang-evocomp"? I don't know...

The only constraints as far as I know are:

a) It should be longer than 2 characters
b) it needs to be a valid Unix/HTML name

maybe push-evolve?

I went through this with the evolutionary objects project where we 
preferred to use 'eo'. This was not allowed, now we live under the 
name 'eodev'

-Maarten-

>   -Lee
>
> On Jul 26, 2004, at 11:29 AM, Rud K5RUD wrote:
> > The name should include a description of why the language
> > exists. So I suggest:
> > Push AI, Push GA/GP, Push Genetic Language.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Rud K5RUD
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Push mailing list
> > Push at lists.hampshire.edu
> > http://lists.hampshire.edu/mailman/listinfo/push
>
> --
> Lee Spector
> Dean, Cognitive Science + Professor, Computer Science
> Cognitive Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA 01002
> lspector at hampshire.edu, http://hampshire.edu/lspector/
> Phone: 413-559-5352, Fax: 413-559-5438
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Push mailing list
> Push at lists.hampshire.edu
> http://lists.hampshire.edu/mailman/listinfo/push