[Clusterusers] cluster planning

Wm. Josiah Erikson wjerikson at hampshire.edu
Wed May 17 09:17:48 EDT 2006


sure, except /share/apps/breve/[version] would make more sense in this 
case because it's cross-mounted across the cluster. If we put it in 
/usr/local, we'd have to reinstall all the compute nodes every time you 
made a version change, which would be slightly obnoxious (although not 
too bad, since reinstalling compute nodes with ROCKS is quite simple)
    -Josiah


Jonathan Klein wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2006, Lee Spector wrote:
>
>> I expect that my next major use of the cluster will involve breve, 
>> and possibly a new built for which we'll have to talk to Jon.
>
>
> For both breve and push3, and potentially for other in-house projects, 
> I think we'll need to come up with some convention for versioning things.
> It's not uncommon that we make updates or bugfixes and need to install 
> new builds on a daily basis.  At the same time, the new builds are 
> potentially unstable or may behave differently, so we'll also want to 
> keep official release copies around as well.
>
> I've been doing this with various versions littered around /opt, but I 
> figure it would be a good idea to have a more standard/documented 
> approach.
>
> Because breve relies on classfiles which change from release to 
> release, it's not as simple as just having multiple breve binaries.  
> So with that in mind, I guess one suggestion would be 
> /usr/local/breve/[version] where version is one of: current, 
> development, or any other version/snapshot we want to keep.  Users 
> could then set their paths and breve environments accordingly.
>
> Does that work?
>
> - jon klein
> _______________________________________________
> Clusterusers mailing list
> Clusterusers at lists.hampshire.edu
> http://lists.hampshire.edu/mailman/listinfo/clusterusers




More information about the Clusterusers mailing list