[Push] More alternatives to reject
Maarten
mkeijzer at xs4all.nl
Mon Jan 12 18:43:53 EST 2004
Hi all,
on the subject of alternative names for push2 that are to be rejected for
various reasons, here's my list:
o Push.DUP (two pushes, does not neccessarity mean an improvement)
o Push.INC (not in the standard function set, and afaik push isn't
incorporated)
o Push.PUSH (maybe push needs to be pushed a bit more, but one can overdo it)
Ok, this is the best I could do varying on this theme, apologies,
-Maarten-
More information about the Push
mailing list