[Clusterusers] glibc version on fly, cluster
Wm. Josiah Erikson
wjerikson at hampshire.edu
Tue May 23 07:40:14 EDT 2017
Just try to build a statically-linked version on your desktop, then see
if it runs on fly.
-Josiah
On 5/22/17 5:49 PM, Bassam Kurdali wrote:
> Ok, so I think the only possible choice, short of an upgrade is choice
> 1 as:
> chroot would likely crash and burn as you have to:
> a- produce an entire system in it
> b- glibc is tied to the kernel running so it would likely crash
>
> docker needs a newer kernel (3.something high, we have 2.6)
>
> I've failed miserably to build blender on fly even before bf bumped the
> glibc requirement - lets see if I can succeed. I'll need to install
> stuff like cmake (and who knows what else, so I'll need help with
> access)
> cheers,
> Bassam
>
> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 11:10 -0400, Wm. Josiah Erikson wrote:
>> Hm. So...
>>
>> Even CentOS 7.3 (the latest) won't get you up to that version of
>> glibc,
>> and updating glibc on a system is, well, not really feasible, since
>> basically everything links against it.
>>
>> So I think we have four choices:
>>
>> 1. See if you can build a statically-linked version of blender
>> that
>> is portable to the cluster. It's not clear to me from the
>> instructions
>> on static linking whether you can statically link glibc or not
>>
>> 2. Build a chrooted environment on the cluster to build and run
>> blender in
>>
>> 3. Update the Macs and use them only
>>
>> 4. Use docker or something to deploy minimal blender servers. I
>> haven't messed with docker yet and don't know how feasible this would
>> be.
>>
>> -Josiah
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/15/17 2:28 PM, Bassam Kurdali wrote:
>>> Thanks Josiah! Glad that it's not just me and my rendering ;)
>>> Crossing fingers and hoping it won't be a big disruptive change
>>> (from
>>> my perspective, if we can get at or beyond glibc 2.19 I'll be happy
>>> as
>>> a clam
>>> On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 22:26 -0400, Wm. Josiah Erikson wrote:
>>>> It looks like there are ways to run newer versions of CentOS
>>>> underneath
>>>> ROCKS 6.2... will research more and attempt to update next week
>>>> if
>>>> it's
>>>> not too disruptive, later this summer if it is. You're hardly the
>>>> only
>>>> person noticing how out-of-date everything is on the cluster. Of
>>>> course
>>>> I also worry that we've been pwned for years and just don't know
>>>> it.
>>>> I
>>>> see no evidence of that... but that means not much. It's past
>>>> time
>>>> for a
>>>> major overhaul.
>>>>
>>>> -Josiah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/12/17 10:08 PM, Wm. Josiah Erikson wrote:
>>>>> Well really the issue is that we're still running ROCKS, and
>>>>> we're
>>>>> a
>>>>> version behind... but ROCKS seems to have fallen behind and a
>>>>> new
>>>>> release hasn't come out in almost two years. I think it's time
>>>>> to
>>>>> move
>>>>> to something else and probably entirely rebuild the cluster.
>>>>> The
>>>>> latest
>>>>> version of ROCKS is based on CentOS 6.6, which is already out
>>>>> of
>>>>> support
>>>>> and doesn't have a new glibc either.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will do some research, ask my HPC colleagues what they're
>>>>> running
>>>>> these days, and ask the ROCKS list what's up - I think they
>>>>> were
>>>>> NFS-funded and, well...
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, we should figure out an interim solution. I shall
>>>>> think
>>>>> about
>>>>> this more next week.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Josiah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/12/17 9:08 PM, Bassam Kurdali wrote:
>>>>>> hi folks,
>>>>>> we're currently at glibc 2.12 which is fairly oldish -
>>>>>> there's a
>>>>>> shiny
>>>>>> new blender with with pretty impressive rendering
>>>>>> improvements
>>>>>> (new
>>>>>> shaders and massive speed increases) - but as of the *last*
>>>>>> blender
>>>>>> version, they dropped glibc older than 2.19
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is mainly a question for josiah, but can we do something
>>>>>> like have
>>>>>> two glibc versions on the system? or some kind of fancy
>>>>>> chroot/local
>>>>>> environment? failing that, I might need some help building
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> fly
>>>>>> (installing dependencies, cmake, etc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>> Bassam
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Clusterusers mailing list
>>>>>> Clusterusers at lists.hampshire.edu
>>>>>> https://lists.hampshire.edu/mailman/listinfo/clusterusers
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clusterusers mailing list
>>> Clusterusers at lists.hampshire.edu
>>> https://lists.hampshire.edu/mailman/listinfo/clusterusers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Clusterusers mailing list
> Clusterusers at lists.hampshire.edu
> https://lists.hampshire.edu/mailman/listinfo/clusterusers
--
-----
Wm. Josiah Erikson
Head, Systems and Networking
Hampshire College
Amherst, MA 01002
More information about the Clusterusers
mailing list