[Antiracism] Support QPOC unjustly sentenced for defending themselves from a street agressor

[gango20s at mtholyoke.edu]

The website for F.I.E.R.C.E. has a pdf on the front page detailing ways 
people can help the 7 young women.

http://www.fiercenyc.org/

New York, NY April 2007

By Bran Fenner

Information/Updates based on court and trial support

On the night of August 18th, 2006 a group of young black lesbians from 
Jersey intended to hang out in the village as was an occasional routine 
until they encountered Wayne Buckle, 29. Buckle approached them making 
vulgar gestures and remarks that were severely homophobic and sexist. 
As the verbal interaction progressed Buckle eventually responded by 
spitting in one of their faces and flicking a lit cigarette at their 
faces as well. There were points captured on the video where he pulls 
out the hair of one of the young women leaving large patches, hair 
later found scattered on the ground. There are also parts of the 
footage as well as testimonial that shows Wayne Buckle on top of one of 
the women choking the life out of her. It was then that another young 
women (Patresse Johnson 4’11” 105 lbs. pulls a kitchen knife out of her 
purse to injure his arm and stop him from potentially killing her 
friend). At that moment two unidentified men came to the women’s aid 
without being asked to and beat Wayne Buckle. When asked at the 
hospital who had attacked him, Buckle responded at least twice that 
some men had attacked him. There was no evidence that Patresse’s 
kitchen knife was the weapon that penetrated his abdomen, nor was their 
any blood or testing done on the kitchen knife. There is even footage 
of them cautiously walking away from him while he continues to walk 
after them. To say the least many of us who were at court everyday 
seeing the trial happen were surprised (due to naivety) that they could 
be found guilty. Even the night they were arrested they thought they 
would be going home as an officer told them while never looking for the 
men that inflicted most of Buckle’s bruises and wounds.


We remember Sakia Gunn a 15 year old black lesbian who was stabbed to 
death in a similar situation, they were also friends of hers.

We understand that when we are being attacked calling the police all 
too often results in being re-victimized by police officers.

We understand that the media coverage has been typically racist, 
consistently referring to the young black women as a pack of wolves 
further dehumanizing them. The energy that the defense attorney’s had 
to put in to have the jury consider them to be average women, planning 
to go to McDonalds and just hang out was unbelievable. At one point the 
prosecuting attorney demanded that someone who feels unsafe should 
always have a cell phone on them to call the police. At the time this 
women could not afford a cell phone. Some people ask why they were just 
hanging out in the village if they were from Jersey. When exactly has 
it become normal to expect that only people with money have the right 
to socialize? When has it become normal to expect that everyone has a 
comfortable home environment and should not be out doors at night or 
any other time of the day?

For many years FIERCE has been fighting that notion of only those with 
money and property have the right to public space. The Christopher st. 
Piers has been a home for many in our community for decades, 
particularly low income or homeless youth of color. This incident is 
not an isolated incident. Many of us have been in situations where some 
randomn person felt entitled to our bodies, whether it be the guy on 
the corner trying to “get a date” or the state whose solution to 
homelessness is incarceration/cheap labor.

Below is a breakdown of their charges and some ways to support. As an 
organization FIERCE has mainly been acting as a support to the women 
and their families. Part of the way we did that was through showing up 
to court as well as helping to connect them to different resources. 
Understandably the mothers are extremely upset right now and so we want 
to wait a bit to hear from them as to what might be helpful as well as 
not wanting to do anything that could be damaging to their sentencing 
which occurs in 1 month. We will keep you as informed as possible given 
that we are still settling into our new space. Right now Opt-Editorials 
will be quite helpful ( i.e Daily News and The Post), we also need 
someone with writing skills who can turn something in to ColorLines. 
The first step is to help promote awareness around the issue.
Thank you all for reading and supporting very important work.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
renata hill, venice brown found not guilty of gang assault 1, but 
guilty of gang assault 2, not guilty of assault 1 and 2, guilty on 
assault 3. terrain dandridge the same except she was found not guilty 
of assault 3. patreese johnson found not guilty of gang assault 1 and 
attempted murder 2, but guilty of gang assault 2 and assault 1 an 2.
  assault 3 is of no consequence as it is only a misdemeanor. for 
renata, venice and terrain, the top count is gang assault 2. it is 
classified under ny law as a class c violent felony. if no one has a 
prior felony conviction, it carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 3 
1/2 years in state prison, up to the maximum of 15 years. since it is a 
violent felony, there is no parole and the person would have to do 
6/7's of the sentence. for example, if the person was sentenced to the 
minimum (3 1/2 years), they would have to do 3 years. if they were 
sentenced to 4 years, they would have to do 3 years, 5 months and 6 
days. they would get credit for any time they have already done 
including time that folks did before they were bailed out).
  for ms. johnson, her situation is worse. while she was acquitted of 
the attempted murder (which is a class b violent felony), she was 
convicted of the assault 1 which is also a b violent. the mandatory 
minimum for that is 5 years , with the maximum being 25 years. the same 
rules apply as to what portion of the sentence she would have to do.
  each person's case has been adjourned for sentencing. renata's is 
scheduled for may 17th at 12 noon. i do not know the adjourned 
dates/times for the rest. within 10 days of a person's sentencing, 
their lawyer will file a 1 page document called a notice of appeal. 
that will start the process of appeal, which under the best of 
circumstances will be at least a year's process. transcripts of the 
hearings, trial and sentencings will have to be ordered and paid for, 
folks get abd pay for (if the cannot afford, they will get assigned 
attorneys) appellete attorneys, briefs will have to be researched and 
prepared, the prosecutor will get to respond, oral arguments will get 
scheduled in the appellate division and after argument the appellate 
court will issue a decision. each of those steps can take a long time.
  there are certainly many things that people could do to be helpful. 
the defendants, their families and friends need support (emotional, 
political and otherwise). at the same time, the defendants are going to 
do time (even if they ultimately win any appeal) so what's going to 
help them do it easier. there are things that folks can do to help 
prepare for sentencing but some of those things might be different than 
what folks could do to begin a campaign to have governor spitzer pardon 
them or commute their sentences. so folks need to define the goals of 
their assistance. i am certain that the lawyers would be helpful in 
reporting to people for them to understand what has happened and what 
they could do. i hope that this email has been helpful.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.